Pages

Thursday, May 3, 2012

hippies - film - 2009 - Taking Woodstock

Taking Woodstock
Ang Lee
Focus Features
2009

120 minutes

Ang Lee, director of Brokeback Mountain, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, and his career centrepiece The Incredible Hulk (haha, just kidding), also directed Taking Woodstock, another film about chance encounters and personal transformations.  In Taking Woodstock, the time and place is upstate New York, 1969 - the crisis: the investor group planning the Woodstock Art Festival has already been barred from holding their from Wallkill NY and the need to find another venue quickly.  The solution: Elliot Tiber, the youngest chamber of commerce president in the history of the tiny-town of Bethel, NY, opens up his family’s “resort” to the Woodstock people as a headquarters, and helps them find a new concert venue on a neighboring dairy farm owned by Max Yasgur.  

The film is about the Woodstock arts festival, but its also about a small number of the small-town characters unbinding their uptight tendencies through their encounters with the Woodstock people and the hippie travellers, Elliot tries drugs and explores his homosexuality - his overbearing parents try drugs and dance in the rain, etc.  Max Yeager agrees to host the concert on his property as a rebellion against the town’s conservative population (who occasionally express their simmering anti-semitism and, at times, appear like they’re ready to launch a pogram against Yasgur and the Tiber’s).







The film presents a perspective on the famous Woodstock concert that pushes the music to the periphery, where it drifts into the centre an echo that’s heard across the rural countryside.  Elliot attends the concert in the sense that he’s on the Yasgur farm while music is played, but he’s so distant from the stage that it’s relevance is primarily to affirm the historical setting of the film.  Instead, the short-lived community that emerged, and the carnivalesque atmosphere that the concert created, is the centre of Lee’s focus with regards to the concert itself.  Elliott slides down a muddy hill and takes LSD in a van with a pair of hippies he met by chance.  
The reproduction of the hallucinogenic experience on film is a standard feature of virtually every hippie and drug movie ever made, from Reefer Madness to Easy Rider to Friday to Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.  The scene provides directors with an opportunity to indulge their facility with visual effects for their own sake, without concern for the constraints of fantastical plot advancements.  In Taking Woodstock Ang Lee places Tiber in a setting that was already decorated in abstract psychedelic patterns that begin glowing and moving after he takes the sacrament of the Aquarian age.  Lee’s filmic visualization of the psychedelic is, in fact, fairly conventional, but it is also true to much of the psychedelic imagery of the era he represents.  In a that vein it should be noted that one of the promotional posters for the film emulates the uniquely colourful ‘rainbow-inking’ printing technique pioneered at the San Francisco Oracle.  One of the hippies metaphorically refers to the vast audience as an ‘ocean’, and Lee uses visual effects to represent it as such in his own psychedelic flourish.




A scene from Taking Woodstock's Hallucination sequence


A final point of interest is the character of Michael Lang, the young hippie who organized the concert and, in the film, is represented as an old friend of Elliot’s.  The film is an adaptation of a heavily contested book written by Tiber, and one of its main disputants is Lang himself.  Tiber is the centre of this film, and he positioned himself as indispensible to the organizing of the concert.  Lang acknowledges Tiber’s role but regards it as minimal, asserting that some aspects of Tiber’s telling are altogether false, including the part where Elliot introduces Lang to Yasgur.  In Tiber’s version, Lang is always kind to Tiber and appreciative of his ideas and always acting as an intercessor between Tiber’s family, the hippies, and his own cost-obsessed investors.  Lang’s last words are in reference to his work in helping the Rolling Stones organize what ended up being the Altamont Free Concert, the anti-Woodstock where the Oakland Hells Angels worked as stage security and killed an aggressive fan (in self defense).  






2 comments:

  1. As was said by the late radio DJ and music historian Pete Fornatale in his own Woodstock book BACK TO THE GARDEN, memories on how Woodstock '69 came together are very much like the Japanese film RASHOMON . . . each person remembers the crazy and hazy (with pot smoke) events of July/August '69 in the lead-up to Woodstock a little differently. It might be added that Mike Lang (in his own book, THE ROAD TO WOODSTOCK) states he was thankful that it was Tiber who - after the show was over and the cleanup had started - gave over to Lang all the cash earned on tickets sold at Tiber's El Monaco motel in the days leading up to the concert. Bottom line: No Elliot Tiber, no Woodstock as it came to be (and as we all now lovingly recall it in the annals of American cultural history) . . .

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the comments, the truth is I haven't delved into any of the actual literature on the Woodstock concert yet and when I first watched this film I didn't know that it was based on a book that Tiber had written... and there must be significant differences even between how Tiber tells the story and how Lee represents it.

    I've added the books you mention to my reading list so hopefully in time I can present a fuller view of how Woodstock has been represented in books and film. I know that some of the critique of Tiber is that he takes a lot of possibly undeserved credit for making Woodstock happen deserve so I'm definitely interested in reading Lang's book on the subject if he fully acknowledges Tiber's relevance to the project. Of course, I also need to read Tiber's book.

    ReplyDelete